Among 276 patients at 12 months, only selected VF-14 activities were associated with binocular uncorrected distance, intermediate or near acuity.
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002096Patients reported better visual function after surgery, yet results across 122 studies varied so widely that one pooled number is a poor forecast for an individual.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2026.07.001In a 340-eye cohort, a sinusoidal pupil-adaptive IOL was associated with better intermediate and near vision, but lens allocation was not randomized.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-026-05426-zIn a prospective 114-eye cohort, both versions produced similar binocular vision from distance to near, while halo burden remained an important limitation.
doi: 10.1155/joph/3788361In a nonrandomized study, EDOF and mix-and-match performed better at intermediate distance, while bifocal and mix-and-match performed better on corrected near testing.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341136In a small randomized trial, overall visual-function and satisfaction measures did not differ across three trifocal IOLs; one intermediate-vision item was exploratory.
doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2566_25In 85 patients, Vivity provided better uncorrected near and intermediate vision, whereas PureSee produced higher contrast sensitivity and less dysphotopsia.
doi: 10.1111/aos.70076In a retrospective sequential cohort, the newer Liberty 677CMY improved several intermediate measures, but the primary binocular endpoint did not reach P<.05.
doi: 10.3390/jcm15176926In an uncontrolled prospective series of 49 patients, the Galaxy IOL provided a functional defocus range to −2.50 D, but it was not compared with another presbyopia-correcting lens.
doi: 10.1007/s00417-026-07521-9In a 160-eye real-world series, the toric Eyhance corrected astigmatism and provided useful distance and intermediate vision, but 79% of assessed patients used reading glasses.
doi: 10.1055/a-2778-8543