In a 340-eye cohort, a sinusoidal pupil-adaptive IOL was associated with better intermediate and near vision, but lens allocation was not randomized.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-026-05426-zIn a prospective 114-eye cohort, both versions produced similar binocular vision from distance to near, while halo burden remained an important limitation.
doi: 10.1155/joph/3788361In a nonrandomized study, EDOF and mix-and-match performed better at intermediate distance, while bifocal and mix-and-match performed better on corrected near testing.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341136In a small randomized trial, overall visual-function and satisfaction measures did not differ across three trifocal IOLs; one intermediate-vision item was exploratory.
doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2566_25In 85 patients, Vivity provided better uncorrected near and intermediate vision, whereas PureSee produced higher contrast sensitivity and less dysphotopsia.
doi: 10.1111/aos.70076