In a 57-eye retrospective series, two different diffractive toric IOLs maintained axis alignment; the trifocal model provided better intermediate vision.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1856827A systematic review of 74 optical studies shows that tolerance to decentration depends on IOL design, especially for aspheric and presbyopia-correcting optics.
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001950In a prospective 114-eye cohort, both versions produced similar binocular vision from distance to near, while halo burden remained an important limitation.
doi: 10.1155/joph/3788361In 804 eyes, a toric IOL reduced mean residual cylinder by 0.05 D but did not improve overall uncorrected or corrected vision.
doi: 10.1007/s40123-026-01483-1In a 141-eye series, Aspire and Aspire Toric produced good distance and intermediate results, but no control group allowed comparison with a standard monofocal IOL.
doi: 10.1007/s40123-026-01473-3In a single-center trial, Clareon T2 reduced residual cylinder and improved uncorrected vision, but did not change contrast performance at three months.
doi: 10.3389/fopht.2026.1755069In a retrospective 70-eye comparison, residual astigmatism was 0.13 D lower with femtosecond capsular marking, but treatment groups were not randomized.
doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_3062_25In a prospective cohort of 122 eyes, vision and satisfaction after PanOptix were similar across the 0.3-mm chord-μ threshold, but only 50 patients completed questionnaires.
doi: 10.1007/s40123-026-01438-6In 70 patients, aligning a Tecnis Toric IOL to the steep meridian with calculated SIA=0 reduced vector error, while the residual-cylinder difference did not reach significance.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S566499In a 160-eye real-world series, the toric Eyhance corrected astigmatism and provided useful distance and intermediate vision, but 79% of assessed patients used reading glasses.
doi: 10.1055/a-2778-8543