In a prospective 114-eye cohort, both versions produced similar binocular vision from distance to near, while halo burden remained an important limitation.
doi: 10.1155/joph/3788361In an uncontrolled prospective series of 49 patients, the Galaxy IOL provided a functional defocus range to −2.50 D, but it was not compared with another presbyopia-correcting lens.
doi: 10.1007/s00417-026-07521-9A randomized trial compared bilateral EDF and monofocal IOL implantation: the extended-depth design improved intermediate and near vision and more often allowed near tasks without spectacles.
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001942In a randomized masked study, 40 patients received DEN00V in one eye and AN6V in the fellow eye. Both provided extended vision at three months, while the primary endpoint favored AN6V.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2026.04.014A prospective study of 28 patients evaluated bilateral Liberty 677MTY implantation. Most participants reported spectacle independence at one year, but the study had no control group.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-026-05145-5In 92 patients, three EDOF approaches improved uncorrected intermediate and near vision compared with a monofocal lens, while the profile of photic phenomena differed between designs.
doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2026.104823A randomized study of 70 cataract patients compared PanOptix with Vivity. Stereopsis favored the EDOF group at one month, while contrast sensitivity did not differ significantly between groups.
doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2015_25In 67 patients, an EDOF lens in the dominant eye and PanOptix in the nondominant eye provided good binocular vision across distances, but overall satisfaction fell to 38.5% by 12 months.
doi: 10.3341/kjo.2026.0105An overview of eight systematic reviews compared multifocal, trifocal, EDOF, accommodative and monofocal IOLs.
doi: 10.1136/bjo-2025-327363