In a 340-eye cohort, a sinusoidal pupil-adaptive IOL was associated with better intermediate and near vision, but lens allocation was not randomized.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-026-05426-zIn a 57-eye retrospective series, two different diffractive toric IOLs maintained axis alignment; the trifocal model provided better intermediate vision.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1856827A systematic review of 74 optical studies shows that tolerance to decentration depends on IOL design, especially for aspheric and presbyopia-correcting optics.
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001950A contemporary review compares anterior-chamber, iris and scleral fixation and finds no universally superior technique.
doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001220In a retrospective 200-eye comparison, IOL-shell surgery used less ultrasound energy and had less one-month endothelial cell loss.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1910499In an ex-vivo model, ePTFE fixation of a four-loop IOL resisted greater displacement force than two flanged techniques.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-61169-3An RCT found no one-year PCO difference between two monofocal IOLs with similar designs but different acrylic materials.
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001814In 72 eyes, decentration was similar, but iris-claw IOLs had less tilt and greater postsaccadic oscillation than flanged scleral-fixated lenses.
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001975A 631-eye meta-analysis found similar corrected acuity but different refractive and operative profiles for two secondary-IOL strategies.
doi: 10.1007/s00417-026-07263-8In 249 eyes, Kane had the lowest absolute error and four modern formulas generally outperformed traditional methods; EVO and Barrett performed better in long eyes.
doi: 10.1155/joph/6375056