In a 340-eye cohort, a sinusoidal pupil-adaptive IOL was associated with better intermediate and near vision, but lens allocation was not randomized.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-026-05426-zIn a 57-eye retrospective series, two different diffractive toric IOLs maintained axis alignment; the trifocal model provided better intermediate vision.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1856827In a nonrandomized study, EDOF and mix-and-match performed better at intermediate distance, while bifocal and mix-and-match performed better on corrected near testing.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341136In a 141-eye series, Aspire and Aspire Toric produced good distance and intermediate results, but no control group allowed comparison with a standard monofocal IOL.
doi: 10.1007/s40123-026-01473-3In a retrospective sequential cohort, the newer Liberty 677CMY improved several intermediate measures, but the primary binocular endpoint did not reach P<.05.
doi: 10.3390/jcm15176926In a prospective series of 30 patients, bilateral SwissPhob implantation produced approximately 20/25 binocular vision at 66 cm and favorable objective optics, but there was no control group.
doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_390_26