One study, its results and limitations.
A systematic review of 38 studies compared AS-OCT- and UBM-based nomograms for ICL sizing and vault prediction. No approach performed consistently better across populations, devices and clinical settings.
doi: 10.1080/08820538.2026.2731256A network meta-analysis of 9 studies and 399 eyes compared 7 formulas for flanged intrascleral IOL fixation. Barrett Universal II ranked consistently well, but no formula showed statistically significant superiority.
doi: 10.1007/s00417-026-07462-3A network meta-analysis of 7 studies and 1,060 eyes compared 12 IOL formulas after vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade. Kane ranked first within ±0.50 D, while EVO led within ±1.00 D.
doi: 10.1159/000551331A retrospective comparison of 598 eyes found high refractive accuracy after FS-LASIK, SMILE and phakic ICL implantation, but different central and peripheral aberration profiles at six months.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-026-04911-9An overview of 85 publications mapped indications for toric IOLs, preoperative measurement, calculation, surgical technique, rotational stability and unresolved questions in astigmatism correction during cataract surgery.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2026.02.043The study compared eight modern IOL power formulas in cataract patients with extremely long eyes.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2026.05.026A meta-analysis compared the efficacy, safety and predictability of transepithelial PRK with LASIK and SMILE.
doi: 10.1177/11206721261425379A randomised trial compared emmetropia, mini-monovision, monovision and partial-range-of-field extended IOLs.
doi: 10.1111/aos.70145A meta-analysis of 15 studies compared standard LASIK with simultaneous accelerated crosslinking in myopic eyes.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.042A randomised trial tested whether intracameral air could reduce endothelial cell loss after surgery for dense nuclear cataract.
doi: 10.1111/ceo.70161