A network meta-analysis of 9 studies and 399 eyes compared 7 formulas for flanged intrascleral IOL fixation. Barrett Universal II ranked consistently well, but no formula showed statistically significant superiority.
doi: 10.1007/s00417-026-07462-3A network meta-analysis of 7 studies and 1,060 eyes compared 12 IOL formulas after vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade. Kane ranked first within ±0.50 D, while EVO led within ±1.00 D.
doi: 10.1159/000551331An overview of 85 publications mapped indications for toric IOLs, preoperative measurement, calculation, surgical technique, rotational stability and unresolved questions in astigmatism correction during cataract surgery.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2026.02.043The study compared eight modern IOL power formulas in cataract patients with extremely long eyes.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2026.05.026A randomised trial compared emmetropia, mini-monovision, monovision and partial-range-of-field extended IOLs.
doi: 10.1111/aos.70145A multicentre randomised trial compared three toric IOLs after phacoemulsification in eyes with regular corneal astigmatism.
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002023An overview of eight systematic reviews compared multifocal, trifocal, EDOF, accommodative and monofocal IOLs.
doi: 10.1136/bjo-2025-327363A meta-analysis compared enhanced and conventional monofocal IOLs after bilateral cataract surgery.
doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03625-4A multicentre randomised trial compared a monofocal extended-depth-of-focus lens with a standard aspheric monofocal IOL. The study explored functional vision, but its small sample limits broad conclusions.
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001672The study compared anterior-chamber and retropupillary iris-claw fixation when capsular support was inadequate.
doi: 10.3928/01913913-20250909-01